Izwe Lethu With definition of African being so complex. Loyalty to Africa being subjective. I see self declaration being being only tool to measure loyality. How will PAC government correct historic injustice? I think that question is more complex than one asked by Cde Mdu. What stops every settler colonist to declare himself a African without true loyalty? All 75% "white" executive management in corporation of this country will declare themselves African continue to work for interest of Europe. Most them have already declared with Bheki in 1996. How will we make a case for transformation, when we win with simple majority that does not allow us to make a revolutionary change (constitutional changes)? In revolutionary scenario, it easy distribute wealth equatable, problem solved.
As per my previous submission. The definition assist in maintaining solidarity therefore a tactical definition not ideological definition. The behaviour of Arabs against indigenous during so-called Arab spring leave sour taste. Northern Sudan and its side kicks in Darfur (Jajawid) brutality against indigenous people put question possibility of brotherhood. Sudan and Egypt strategy of building dams and sinking any trace of "Black African" claim in region. The behaviour of Caucasian Asians against African workers is despicable. We are tempted to look European descendants as only oppressor. Without using personal experience as analysis tool, when pass through United Arab Emirates with plane full of European descendants and young African couple. Out of that Plane we were only three search, thoroughly screened and passport temporary seized. We not even destine to that country, we were going to Europe but security there found it fit to embarrass us. This makes agree with William Chancellor, Chinwuazi and Mzi on question redefinition of relationship with Arabs in Africa. The aim of settler colonialism (Asian or European) was to permanent claim the land (Africa). Distort identity hence call us 'blacks', 'Negros' and not Africans. The definition does not assist in opposing aims of settler colonialism. The definition become dangerously close to 'land belong to those who live in it'. It should be noted that disputing that definition does not translate to consuming by hatred other peoples of the world. Sbu On 12 August 2011 10:05, Mduduzi Sibeko <[email protected]> wrote: > Cde Seroke: > > Do you know cde Gumede in an attached document. > > > This email and any accompanying attachments may contain confidential and > proprietary information. This information is private and protected by law > and, accordingly, if you are not the intended recipient, you are requested > to delete this entire communication immediately and are notified that any > disclosure, copying or distribution of or taking any action based on this > information is prohibited. > > Emails cannot be guaranteed to be secure or free of errors or viruses. The > sender does not accept any liability or responsibility for any interception, > corruption, destruction, loss, late arrival or incompleteness of or > tampering or interference with any of the information contained in this > email or for its incorrect delivery or non-delivery for whatsoever reason or > for its effect on any electronic device of the recipient. Views and opinions > expressed or implied in this email are those of the sender unless clearly > stated as being that of Rand Water. If verification of this email or any > attachment is required, please request a hard-copy version. > > -- > Sending your posting to [email protected] > > Unsubscribe by sending an email to [email protected] > > You can also visit http://groups.google.com/group/payco > > Visit our website at www.mayihlome.wordpress.com > -- Sending your posting to [email protected] Unsubscribe by sending an email to [email protected] You can also visit http://groups.google.com/group/payco Visit our website at www.mayihlome.wordpress.com
