Well, chiming in here as I've used both, I would definitely have to 
say that my favorite of the 2 is sound forge.  However, I do find 
Goldwave to be effecive if all you need to do is a quick touchup job 
on somehing, or maybe add an efect or something. It all depends on 
what job you wanna do.


At 04:25 PM 5/25/2006, you wrote:
>I'd have to respectfully agree with Bruce here.  Goldwave is an excellent
>program if you know how to use it correctly.  It not be SF but then again I
>am not trying to make money using it either.  A lot of us can't afford $250
>for SF and its kind of unfair to paint goldwave the way you have for the
>general users out there that are not trying to make a living using it.
>
>Rick
>
>
>=======
>
>Contact Information:
>
>Skype ID: rharmon928
>MSN ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Phone: 330-724-6093
>Location: Akron, Ohio USA
>
>Visit my new mailing list on www.freelists.org
>
>blind_geek_zone
>
>
>"The chief handicap of the blind is not blindness, but the attitude of
>seeing people towards them."
>- Helen Keller, 1925
>
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Bruce Toews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "PC audio discussion list. " <pc-audio@pc-audio.org>
>Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 5:17 PM
>Subject: RE: gold wave vs sound forge
>
>
>I disagree strongly with your contention that Gold Wave can't be
>considered for serious sound editing. It has beenby many, and still is by
>many. I do all my audio editing with Gold Wave, and while I'm no
>professional recording studio, I'm no slouch at the concept either, and
>there are people who are much more professional than I with recording who
>will agree. I'm not denying the superiority of Sound Forge as a sound
>editor, but if you're comfortable with Gold Wave's interface, as I am,
>then the power is there.
>
>bruce
>
>--
>Yet to all who received him, to those who believed in his name, he
>gave the right to become children of God. John 1:12 NIV
>
>Bruce Toews
>E-mail and MSN/Windows Messenger: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Radio Show and Podcast: http://www.totw.net
>Web Site (including info on my weekly commentaries): http://www.ogts.net
>Info on the Best TV Show of All Time: http://www.cornergas.com
>
>On Thu, 25 May 2006, Jonathan Mosen wrote:
>
> > Hi all, some interesting points in this thread. From my point of view, if
> > you're willing to invest in the tool that gets the job done most
> > efficiently, Sound Forge is so far ahead that Goldwave isn't even worth
> > your
> > consideration. I say this because the reason Sound Forge became the
> > leading
> > single track editor in the blind community is because of the way in which
> > it
> > embraces standard Windows navigation and selection methods. So if you're a
> > competent user of word processors like MS word, and you understand how to
> > select text in regular Windows applications, your learning curve with
> > Sound
> > Forge is minimised hugely. I would put Studio Recorder way ahead of
> > Goldwave
> > and in some respects better than Sound Forge for certain tasks. For
> > example,
> > the sound don sound feature in the latest Studio Recorder is incredibly
> > easy
> > to use, yet powerful. It also attempts where possible to adhere to Windows
> > standards. It's special accessibility features make it worthy of serious
> > consideration, particularly if you don't require lots of special affects.
> >
> > For those constrained by limited time, selecting and manipulating sound in
> > Sound Forge or Studio Recorder is vastly more efficient than Goldwave is.
> >
> > If money is a consideration, I would still recommend Sound Forge's cut
> > down
> > version because of the superior adherence to Windows conventions, although
> > Goldwave is definitely more feature rich than this version of Sound Forge.
> > If you're not serious about sound editing and want something to play with,
> > maybe Goldwave is sufficient. Sound Forge is used in many professional
> > environments for a good reason. It's powerful. Perhaps it provides more
> > power than some people need, but really, there's no comparison in terms of
> > functionality and ease of use, and you may find yourself gaining more
> > experience and find Goldwave constraining. So depending on your needs, I'd
> > say Sound Forge and Studio Recorder are in a class of their own. Goldwave
> > is
> > in a different class.
> >
> > The Minx, the Internet radio station that plays all the great love songs.
> >
> > http://www.the-minx.com
> > Jonathan Mosen
> > Blog, podcast and radio show: http://www.MosenExplosion.com
> > Ph: +1-925-566-9265.
> > Mobile/SMS +1-806-252-6671
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
> > http://www.pc-audio.org
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we
> > offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
> >
>
>_______________________________________________
>PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
>http://www.pc-audio.org
>
>To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we
>offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
>http://www.pc-audio.org
>
>To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other 
>lists we offer, visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com


_______________________________________________
PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... 
http://www.pc-audio.org

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

This list is a service of MosenExplosion.com. To see what other lists we offer, 
visit us on the web at http://www.MosenExplosion.com

Reply via email to