WMA lossless actually produce smallest file than FLAC, well, only a bit smallest, but only the MS zune mp3 player do support WMA lossless.
so, as with Apple AAC Lossless, you are pretty closed with MS audio format to MS hardware too. -------------------- Arnaud de Bonald - Paris France - WeBlog: http://www.echo-on.org albert griffith a écrit : > According to what you say, flak is no better than WMA lossless. > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of Steve Matzura > Sent: Saturday, November 24, 2007 6:31 AM > To: PC Audio Discussion List > Subject: Re: The advantages of flak? > > On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 15:35:44 +1100, you wrote: > >> FLAC IS LOSSLESS SO WHAT YOU HEAR IN THE ORIGINAL IS WHAT YOU HEAR WITH >> FLAC. > > Well, it's supposed to be. I've never read any test reports that say what > comes out equals what went in. I can only hope it's that way. > > > > Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... > http://www.pc-audio.org > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... > http://www.pc-audio.org > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
