Ignore that, the whole purpose of VBR is to encode every sample at a bit rate, 
you don't want encoding of say silent samples done at 128k as that's just 
wasting band width.


On 19/08/2010, at 11:47 PM, richard claypool wrote:

> I'd not set the min quality for as low as posible because that's too low. i'd 
> set maybe 128 as your lowest point, and then whatever you want as your 
> highest point.  If you can't hear above 192, and won't be shairng the files, 
> then maybe set it to 192.
> 
> msn
> bellevue....@gmail.com
> skype
> lord_of_beer
> last fm
> http://last.fm/lord_of_beer
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dane Trethowan" <grtd...@internode.on.net>
> To: "PC Audio Discussion List" <pc-audio@pc-audio.org>
> Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 9:31 AM
> Subject: Re: Best bitrate quality for hearing aid users?
> 
> 
>> Well really this is a very strange questions, I've been wearing digital 
>> hearing aids for 15 years and I'n now asking myself, why should encoding of 
>> sound be any different to those wearing hearing aids than for those who are 
>> not? By that I mean you encode the way you want and the way you like but one 
>> thing I do know when wearing good hearing instruments is that you want the 
>> best quality sound you can get.  An audio engineer once recommended me use 
>> VBR quality and I did post instructions on how to set this up with LAME and 
>> what all the settings meant quite some time ago so I'm sure you'll find it 
>> if you look in the archives.  Basically what you need to do is set the 
>> minimum bit rate to as low as possible and the maximum bit rate to as high 
>> as possible.  There are 2 quality bit rates, the VBR bit rate will need to 
>> be changed according to what you're encoding but a good setting for music is 
>> "3", the lower the number then the less the encoder rejects from the 
>> encoding.  If you set the VBR quality to "1" then you may as well use a 
>> lossless compression such as FLAC.  Use Joint stereo.
>> 
>> Of course I'm referring to MP3 encoding with LAME here.
>> 
>> 
>> On 19/08/2010, at 3:03 AM, chris hallsworth wrote:
>> 
>>> Hello all,
>>> I have been equipped with two very powerful digital hearing aids literally 
>>> today. I'm wondering what is the best in terms of audio quality. By that I 
>>> mean things like 44,100HZ 16 bit or 128KBPS.
>>> Many thanks in advance for any suggestions.
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Sent using Thunderbird
>>> 
>>> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
>>> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
>> 
>> 
>> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
>> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org 
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
> pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org


To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org

Reply via email to