Also, if there really were no point at all, then why even make them? HD movies on BDs are 24 bit, and I hear something in those by the way, and I know sony said on a tutorial for SF that it's to capture more info or capture the info more acuritlyor completely? But why waist the space then? But I digress. Point is and now it's a thesis I guess because it can be argued, it would be good to have it just in case you do need it and it ends up meening something.
-----Original Message----- From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of tim cumings Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2013 7:03 PM To: PC Audio Discussion List Subject: Re: best digital recording thats blind friendly in my opinion 96.1 khz 24 kbps is overkill for most recording since humans can't even hear above about 20 khz. in ----- Original Message ----- From: "Hamit Campos" <hamitcam...@gmail.com> To: "'PC Audio Discussion List'" <pc-audio@pc-audio.org> Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2013 6:04 PM Subject: RE: best digital recording thats blind friendly > Yeah, I'd go with the Olympus ones. Even the LS-7 might do since you > don't seem to be too demanding on sound quality. I recommend this one > since it does 96 KHZ 24 Bit. So does the H1 but my problem is you > can't pause whilst recording. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of > dennis > Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2013 4:20 PM > To: PC audio discussion list. > Subject: best digital recording thats blind friendly > > hello list. i need a decent digital recorder with decent condenser > mike that is easy to use and makes good recordings of live music > performences.any ideas? > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org > > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: > pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
