Hi PCErs, I think it is key to have a document about the stateful PCE applicability, so the rationale behind stateful and active PCE is well understood. Let me point out that I also speak as a contributing author, so I am biased..
The applicability draft documents a set of use cases considered by the authors and contributors. It would be great that if people that is considering additional use cases for the stateful PCE or active PCE beyond those already identified in the draft could share them. Best Regards, Oscar On 06/21/2013 06:16 PM, Ina Minei wrote: Dear chairs and working group, In light of the recent working group re-charter which now includes stateful PCE, we wanted to hear the opinions of the group on 1. the need for an applicability document for stateful PCE and 1. whether draft-zhang-pce-stateful-pce-app satisfies this need, or any gaps it might have Thank you, Ina and Xian _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org<mailto:Pce@ietf.org>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace situado más abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
