Hi Adrian, > How would you all feel about 8? (My instinct is to push for 4, but I can > pre-emptively compromise :-)
I can work with 8 :) Regards, Dhruv > -----Original Message----- > From: Adrian Farrel [mailto:adr...@olddog.co.uk] > Sent: 15 June 2016 23:52 > To: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.dh...@huawei.com>; 'Ramon Casellas' > <ramon.casel...@cttc.es>; pce@ietf.org > Subject: RE: [Pce] Experimental Codepoint allocation in PCEP registry > > To Ramon's point... > > > We do need to reach a consensus on what range to set aside. > > Yes, we do. Both to satisfy ourselves and to get past the current IESG (not > the one that approved the MANET registry). > > I think you captured the essence. There should be enough code points to run > the parallel experiments that need to be run together, but not so many that > experiments that don't need to be run at the same time can grab values and > expect to keep them. Essentially, before running an experiment all > participants should get together to agree what values to use, and then when > the experiment is over they should consider the values to have no meaning > (until the next and completely different experiment). > > As far as I can see, 30 messages looks like a complete orgy of > experimentation! > Four times more active experimentation in one experimental network than in > the whole of the standardised and soon-to-be standardised history of PCEP. > > How would you all feel about 8? (My instinct is to push for 4, but I can > pre-emptively compromise :-) > > Adrian > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody > > Sent: 10 June 2016 11:03 > > To: Ramon Casellas; pce@ietf.org > > Subject: Re: [Pce] Experimental Codepoint allocation in PCEP registry > > > > Hi Ramon, > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ramon Casellas > > > Sent: 10 June 2016 14:42 > > > To: pce@ietf.org > > > Subject: Re: [Pce] Experimental Codepoint allocation in PCEP > > > registry > > > > > > Hi Dhruv, Jeff, all > > > > > > Indeed. Having been involved in PCE-related experimental and > > > research activities I would welcome this and could be very helpful. > > > It will not solve the issues but at least it defines the ranges. > > > > > > I can't provide much feedback, just curious about the rationale to > > > allocate a given range e.g. 224-255 > 30 messages, etc. > > > > [Dhruv] You hit the jackpot.... we wanted to get the feedback of the > > WG about this. > > > > IMHO we need to strike a right balance that there are enough > > codepoints set aside for multiple parallel experimentations at a given > > time, and not to give > up a > > big chunk out for experimentation that it hinders IANA allocation. > > > > We currently have 9 messages set by IANA, some 4 new messages in queue > > to be sent to IANA, 13/255 ... so we do not have to worry about > > running out any time soon :) > > > > BTW I could find one instance in MANET where a similar range is > > allocated - > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5444#section-6.2 > > > > We do need to reach a consensus on what range to set aside. > > > > Regards, > > Dhruv > > > > > > > > Best regards > > > Ramon > > > > > > On 10/06/2016 11:00, Jeff Tantsura wrote: > > > > Hi Dhruv, > > > > > > > > Support, very much needed! > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Jeff > > > > > > > > On 6/9/16, 5:09 AM, "Pce on behalf of Dhruv Dhody" > > > > <pce-boun...@ietf.org > > > on behalf of dhruv.dh...@huawei.com> wrote: > > > > > > > >> Hi WG, > > > >> > > > >> In PCE IANA registry [http://www.iana.org/assignments/pcep] we do > > > >> not > > > have any codepoints for experimental usage. As we work on some new > > experiments > > > with PCEP (sometimes in open source platform), it would be wise to > > > use experimental codepoints to avoid any conflict. For this purpose > > > we have written a small draft to carve out some codepoints for > > > experimental usage for PCEP messages, objects and TLVs. > > > >> > > > >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dhody-pce-pcep-exp-codepoints-0 > > > >> 0 > > > >> > > > >> Please provide your feedback. > > > >> > > > >> Thanks, > > > >> Dhruv & Daniel > > > >> > > > >> ----- > > > >> > > > >> Name: draft-dhody-pce-pcep-exp-codepoints > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Pce mailing list > > > Pce@ietf.org > > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pce mailing list > > Pce@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
