Hi Adrian, 8 sounds like a good number.
Cheers, Jeff On 6/16/16, 9:25 AM, "Pce on behalf of Dhruv Dhody" <pce-boun...@ietf.org on behalf of dhruv.dh...@huawei.com> wrote: >Hi Adrian, > >> How would you all feel about 8? (My instinct is to push for 4, but I can >> pre-emptively compromise :-) > >I can work with 8 :) > >Regards, >Dhruv > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Adrian Farrel [mailto:adr...@olddog.co.uk] >> Sent: 15 June 2016 23:52 >> To: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.dh...@huawei.com>; 'Ramon Casellas' >> <ramon.casel...@cttc.es>; pce@ietf.org >> Subject: RE: [Pce] Experimental Codepoint allocation in PCEP registry >> >> To Ramon's point... >> >> > We do need to reach a consensus on what range to set aside. >> >> Yes, we do. Both to satisfy ourselves and to get past the current IESG (not >> the one that approved the MANET registry). >> >> I think you captured the essence. There should be enough code points to run >> the parallel experiments that need to be run together, but not so many that >> experiments that don't need to be run at the same time can grab values and >> expect to keep them. Essentially, before running an experiment all >> participants should get together to agree what values to use, and then when >> the experiment is over they should consider the values to have no meaning >> (until the next and completely different experiment). >> >> As far as I can see, 30 messages looks like a complete orgy of >> experimentation! >> Four times more active experimentation in one experimental network than in >> the whole of the standardised and soon-to-be standardised history of PCEP. >> >> How would you all feel about 8? (My instinct is to push for 4, but I can >> pre-emptively compromise :-) >> >> Adrian >> >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody >> > Sent: 10 June 2016 11:03 >> > To: Ramon Casellas; pce@ietf.org >> > Subject: Re: [Pce] Experimental Codepoint allocation in PCEP registry >> > >> > Hi Ramon, >> > >> > > -----Original Message----- >> > > From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ramon Casellas >> > > Sent: 10 June 2016 14:42 >> > > To: pce@ietf.org >> > > Subject: Re: [Pce] Experimental Codepoint allocation in PCEP >> > > registry >> > > >> > > Hi Dhruv, Jeff, all >> > > >> > > Indeed. Having been involved in PCE-related experimental and >> > > research activities I would welcome this and could be very helpful. >> > > It will not solve the issues but at least it defines the ranges. >> > > >> > > I can't provide much feedback, just curious about the rationale to >> > > allocate a given range e.g. 224-255 > 30 messages, etc. >> > >> > [Dhruv] You hit the jackpot.... we wanted to get the feedback of the >> > WG about this. >> > >> > IMHO we need to strike a right balance that there are enough >> > codepoints set aside for multiple parallel experimentations at a given >> > time, and not to give >> up a >> > big chunk out for experimentation that it hinders IANA allocation. >> > >> > We currently have 9 messages set by IANA, some 4 new messages in queue >> > to be sent to IANA, 13/255 ... so we do not have to worry about >> > running out any time soon :) >> > >> > BTW I could find one instance in MANET where a similar range is >> > allocated - >> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5444#section-6.2 >> > >> > We do need to reach a consensus on what range to set aside. >> > >> > Regards, >> > Dhruv >> > >> > > >> > > Best regards >> > > Ramon >> > > >> > > On 10/06/2016 11:00, Jeff Tantsura wrote: >> > > > Hi Dhruv, >> > > > >> > > > Support, very much needed! >> > > > >> > > > Thanks, >> > > > Jeff >> > > > >> > > > On 6/9/16, 5:09 AM, "Pce on behalf of Dhruv Dhody" >> > > > <pce-boun...@ietf.org >> > > on behalf of dhruv.dh...@huawei.com> wrote: >> > > > >> > > >> Hi WG, >> > > >> >> > > >> In PCE IANA registry [http://www.iana.org/assignments/pcep] we do >> > > >> not >> > > have any codepoints for experimental usage. As we work on some new >> > experiments >> > > with PCEP (sometimes in open source platform), it would be wise to >> > > use experimental codepoints to avoid any conflict. For this purpose >> > > we have written a small draft to carve out some codepoints for >> > > experimental usage for PCEP messages, objects and TLVs. >> > > >> >> > > >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dhody-pce-pcep-exp-codepoints-0 >> > > >> 0 >> > > >> >> > > >> Please provide your feedback. >> > > >> >> > > >> Thanks, >> > > >> Dhruv & Daniel >> > > >> >> > > >> ----- >> > > >> >> > > >> Name: draft-dhody-pce-pcep-exp-codepoints >> > > >> > > _______________________________________________ >> > > Pce mailing list >> > > Pce@ietf.org >> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Pce mailing list >> > Pce@ietf.org >> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce > >_______________________________________________ >Pce mailing list >Pce@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
