I am in full support of the changes and in full support of this draft. I would like to thank all of the supports that we are getting for this draft.
A. Raghuram Global IP/MPLS Backbone Design & Development 732-420-2471 ar2...@att.com This communication may contain information that is privileged, or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please note FYI that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. Anyone who receives this message in error should notify the sender immediately by telephone or by return e-mail and delete it from his or her computer. -----Original Message----- From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julien Meuric Sent: Monday, January 22, 2018 10:05 AM To: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request Hi all, Back in Prague, draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request raised clear interest. Since then, the authors have done their homework, including the removal of suggested values. Let us now share the question with the whole WG: do you think draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request is a good foundation for a PCE WG item? Please send your responses to the PCE list, including rationales in case of disagreement. Thanks, Jon & Julien _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_pce&d=DwICAg&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=QNToJ4byfiy_4vy6H7dTgAPqN3XciMGI3LRm7GcpRS0&m=wURoF-Mabq0cYy4wiuHB-gJPa-hn0pwXy-zOIZx0f4w&s=FOvyqqUP6xJ8bucKyLF2AImz9XRU-jTSkRGwHJ2TX5s&e= _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
