In full support of this draft.
Al Goddard Principal Member of Technical Staff AT&T Labs - Packet Optical Network 732.420.0286 - Q This email and any files transmitted with it are AT&T property, are confidential, and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom this email is addressed. If you are not one of the named recipient(s) or otherwise have reason to believe that you have received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately from your computer. Any other use, retention, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. -----Original Message----- From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julien Meuric Sent: Monday, January 22, 2018 10:05 AM To: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request Hi all, Back in Prague, draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request raised clear interest. Since then, the authors have done their homework, including the removal of suggested values. Let us now share the question with the whole WG: do you think draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request is a good foundation for a PCE WG item? Please send your responses to the PCE list, including rationales in case of disagreement. Thanks, Jon & Julien _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_pce&d=DwICAg&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=dBQU2WlitK5DqmLybyoy9w&m=cKwryO0JMLt1UsAy5gDfD6h7-ANldaIS3QNXLSW2GB8&s=ClAokRODdQ1DvYBKm8IqaeHAzxQa9Apwx9V2VgBUDfI&e= _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
