On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 10:48:41PM +0100, Adrian Farrel wrote: > > Responding to just the Discuss portion due to time constraints before the > > telechat... > > Understood > > Top posting: > > This really feels like a problem for 5575bis. I'm beginning to think we > overstepped by even mentioning it in this document. I wanted to draw out the > risks and confusions (almost to say "don't do that") without trampling on > existing practice or messing with BGP. This is (clearly?) not the document > to tell people how to manage their BGP FlowSpecs, yet we wanted to inherit > as much as possible from BGP, yet we don't want people to damage themselves, > yet the scissors are sharp and they enjoy running. > > You paragraph of suggestions of pointers of how/when to do AND and OR is a > reasonable starting point. But surely it is something that belongs in > 5575bis?
I suspect you are right... Alvaro, what do you think? -Ben _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
