Hi WG,

A reminder to the WG to be more vocal. I am copying this slide from
the chair's WG status slide
[https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/108/slides/slides-108-pce-1-introduction-01]

> Please be Vocal
>
> o During WG Adoption and WG LC calls, the response is less.
>
> o Please be vocal on the list to help us gauge the consensus better.
>
> o The working group mailing lists are looked at by the IESG, IAB, and others 
> (internal and external to IETF) to determine interest/participation level in 
> our standards process.
>
> o Please review ideas from your peers, these are community outputs of the 
> working group as a whole.
>

The WG LC for the draft in question ends on Monday 21st Sept. Please
respond with your explicit support (or not) for its publication.

Thanks!
Dhruv & Julien



On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 10:43 AM Dhruv Dhody <d...@dhruvdhody.com> wrote:
>
> Hi WG,
>
> This email starts a working group last call for
> draft-ietf-pce-association-policy [1].  Please indicate your support
> or concern for this draft. If you are opposed to the progression of
> the draft to RFC, please articulate your concern. If you support it,
> please indicate that you have read the latest version and it is ready
> for publication in your opinion. As always, review comments and nits
> are most welcome.
>
> The WG LC will end on 21st September 2020.
>
> Thanks,
> Dhruv & Julien
> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-association-policy/

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Reply via email to