I support this document. It provides a useful mechanism to apply policies either on the PCC or on the PCE.
Comment: it should be clarified whether PCUpd message can be used instead of the PCInit message when updating the PAG that is "enforced by the PCC". I believe PCUpd can be used, but the draft should make that explicit, for example in Figure 1. Thanks, Mike. -----Original Message----- From: Pce <pce-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody Sent: Friday, September 4, 2020 1:13 AM To: pce@ietf.org Cc: draft-ietf-pce-association-pol...@ietf.org; pce-chairs <pce-cha...@ietf.org> Subject: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-association-policy Hi WG, This email starts a working group last call for draft-ietf-pce-association-policy [1]. Please indicate your support or concern for this draft. If you are opposed to the progression of the draft to RFC, please articulate your concern. If you support it, please indicate that you have read the latest version and it is ready for publication in your opinion. As always, review comments and nits are most welcome. The WG LC will end on 21st September 2020. Thanks, Dhruv & Julien [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-association-policy/ _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
