Hi， I support the document. This document is well written and the text is mature. Also, I think this is a good base work for associating bidir LSPs for MPLS, SR-MPLS and even SRv6.
Thanks, Cheng -----Original Message----- From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody Sent: Tuesday, October 6, 2020 1:17 AM To: pce@ietf.org Cc: draft-ietf-pce-association-bi...@ietf.org; pce-chairs <pce-cha...@ietf.org> Subject: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir Hi WG, This email starts a working group last call for draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir [1]. Please indicate your support or concern for this draft. If you are opposed to the progression of the draft to RFC, please articulate your concern. If you support it, please indicate that you have read the latest version and it is ready for publication in your opinion. As always, review comments and nits are most welcome. A general reminder to the WG to be more vocal during the LC and adoption calls. The WG LC will end on 20th October 2020. Thanks, Dhruv & Julien [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir/ _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
