Hi WG, Just a reminder, the WG LC ends tomorrow, please respond to the LC before that with a request for the WG to be more vocal on the list [1].
Also, IPR responses from Colby and Bin are missing [2]. Thanks! Dhruv & Julien [1] https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/108/slides/slides-108-pce-1-introduction-01 > Please be Vocal > > o During WG Adoption and WG LC calls, the response is less. > > o Please be vocal on the list to help us gauge the consensus better. > > o The working group mailing lists are looked at by the IESG, IAB, and others > (internal and external to IETF) to determine interest/participation level in > our standards process. > > o Please review ideas from your peers, these are community outputs of the > working group as a whole. > [2] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/CMUB1JbyWAx5O-3Lj3Pfytzta0g/ On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 10:46 PM Dhruv Dhody <d...@dhruvdhody.com> wrote: > > Hi WG, > > This email starts a working group last call for > draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir [1]. Please indicate your support or > concern for this draft. If you are opposed to the progression of the > draft to RFC, please articulate your concern. If you support it, > please indicate that you have read the latest version and it is ready > for publication in your opinion. As always, review comments and nits > are most welcome. A general reminder to the WG to be more vocal during > the LC and adoption calls. > > The WG LC will end on 20th October 2020. > > Thanks, > Dhruv & Julien > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir/ _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
