Hi WG,
I support the adoption of this draft. I think this is an very useful extension. There are several comments after reviewing the document: 1) It is mentioned the example of SR-MPLS and SRv6 in the draft. What about IPv6? Is it possible to add an example for IPv6 by leveraging draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip? 2) What is the relation of the IFIT PCEP extension with the companion draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-ifit which defines the BGP extension to enable IFIT methods for SR policy? 3) Section 2.1 is about “IFIT for SR Policies” and Section 6 is about “Example of application to SR Policy”. Since the PCEP Extension is general for all path types and SR Policy is just an example, why not merge section 2.1 in section 6? Thanks Wangxuerong +86 15323320217 xuerongwang_chinatele...@hotmail.com/wang...@chinatelecom.cn ________________________________ 发件人: Dhruv Dhody <d...@dhruvdhody.com> 发送时间: 2022年6月24日 16:58 收件人: pce@ietf.org <pce@ietf.org> 抄送: draft-chen-pce-pcep-i...@ietf.org <draft-chen-pce-pcep-i...@ietf.org> 主题: WG Adoption of draft-chen-pce-pcep-ifit-06 Hi WG, This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-chen-pce-pcep-ifit-06. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-pce-pcep-ifit/ Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons - Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are you willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to the list. Please respond by Monday 11th July 2022. Please be more vocal during WG polls! Thanks! Dhruv & Julien
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
