Hi,
I read through this draft as part of the adoption poll. I found it quite hard to work out from the Abstract what the purpose of the document is. The Introduction is a little more informative, but also quite hard work. It turns out, when you read the document, that two things are being defined: 1. A set of attributes to allow a PCE to instruct a PCC as to which IFIT behaviours it should enable on a path. 2. A capabilities flags so that a PCC can indicate which IFIT functions it supports. I think the Abstract might usefully read as follows. In-situ Flow Information Telemetry (IFIT) refers to network OAM data plane on-path telemetry techniques, in particular In-situ OAM (IOAM) and Alternate Marking. This document defines PCEP extensions to allow a Path Computation Client (PCC) to indicate which IFIT features it supports, and a Path Computation Element (PCE) to configure IFIT behavior at a PCC for a specific path in the stateful PCE model. The PCEP extensions described in this document are defined for use with Segment Routing (SR). They could be generalized for all path types, but that is out of scope of this document. The Introduction might also usefully change in that way. --- While I appreciate that the authors are primarily concerned with SR, I think the WG should carefully consider taking the authors at their word and pursuing the generalisation to all path types. That can't be much additional work, and it would surely make sense to get the solution to be generic from day one. --- Please move the requirements language from the front-matter to its own section (probably 1.1). --- With the clarification of the intent of the document, I would support the working group working on this document, and it could be adopted. Regards, Adrian From: Pce <pce-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody Sent: 24 June 2022 09:59 To: pce@ietf.org Cc: draft-chen-pce-pcep-i...@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-chen-pce-pcep-ifit-06 Hi WG, This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-chen-pce-pcep-ifit-06. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-pce-pcep-ifit/ Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons - Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are you willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to the list. Please respond by Monday 11th July 2022. Please be more vocal during WG polls! Thanks! Dhruv & Julien
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
