Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-pce-lsp-extended-flags-07: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-lsp-extended-flags/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you to Shivan Kaul Sahib for the SECDIR review. ** Section 9. Perhaps repeat what is already said in Section 4 here (“They are also expected to discuss any security implications of the additional flags (if any) and their interactions with existing flags.”): OLD This document provides for future addition of flags in the LSP Object. NEW This document provides for the future addition of flags in the LSP Object. The documents which will specific these flags must discuss their associate security implications. _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
