Hi Roman, Thanks for your review!
On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 7:15 AM Roman Danyliw via Datatracker < nore...@ietf.org> wrote: > Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-pce-lsp-extended-flags-07: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to > https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ > for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-lsp-extended-flags/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Thank you to Shivan Kaul Sahib for the SECDIR review. > > ** Section 9. Perhaps repeat what is already said in Section 4 here > (“They are > also expected to discuss any security implications of the additional flags > (if > any) and their interactions with existing flags.”): > > OLD > This document provides for future addition of flags in the LSP > Object. > > NEW > This document provides for the future addition of flags in the LSP > Object. The > documents which will specific these flags must discuss their associate > security > implications. > > > Good suggestion! Thanks! Dhruv (as a shepherd) > > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > Pce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce >
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
