Quan — Looks good to me, thank you. Lars — I believe your DISCUSS has been taken care of, please take a look.
Thanks, —John > On Oct 23, 2022, at 4:09 AM, xiong.q...@zte.com.cn wrote: > > [External Email. Be cautious of content] > > > Hi Jonn and Dhruv, > > Thanks for your detailed review and suggestions! > I submitted a -09 version to resolve the following three issues. > 1, In Section 5, paragraph 2, "would" was replaced to "MUST". > 2, In Section 9, a sentence was added at the end with "Assuming that > recommendation is followed, then the flags will be protected by TLS." Thanks > for the suggestion from John. > 3, In Section 9, the second sentence was revised to "Any future document > that specifies new flags must also discuss any associated security > implications." Thanks for the suggestion from Dhruv. > Please let me know if you have other comments and suggestions. > > Regards, > Quan > > > > > > From: JohnScudder <j...@juniper.net> > To: 熊泉00091065; > Cc: d...@dhruvdhody.com <d...@dhruvdhody.com>;l...@eggert.org > <l...@eggert.org>;i...@ietf.org > <i...@ietf.org>;draft-ietf-pce-lsp-extended-fl...@ietf.org > <draft-ietf-pce-lsp-extended-fl...@ietf.org>;pce-cha...@ietf.org > <pce-cha...@ietf.org>;pce@ietf.org <pce@ietf.org>; > Date: 2022年10月23日 02:55 > Subject: Re: [PCE]Lars Eggert's Discuss on > draft-ietf-pce-lsp-extended-flags-07: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) > On Oct 22, 2022, at 1:14 PM, John Scudder <j...@juniper.net> wrote: >> >> if you want to, you could add one sentence to the end of Section 9, perhaps >> “If that recommendation is followed, then the flags will be protected by >> TLS." > > Or maybe better, “Assuming that recommendation is followed, then the flags > will be protected by TLS.“ > > —John _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
