From: Pce <pce-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of tom petch <ie...@btconnect.com>
Sent: 17 November 2022 10:42
From: Pce <pce-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of julien.meu...@orange.com
<julien.meu...@orange.com>
Sent: 17 November 2022 09:38
As mentioned in the PCE session during IETF 115, this WGLC has ended.
Thanks Tom for your review. Comment resolution is in progress.
<tp>
-20 did appear in October. Is that worth looking at or waiting for -21?
<tp2>
Sigh, it is big, it is complicated and one day I will get to review it all, but
not just yet.
MSD. Treated here as a single value but other I-D now treat it as a list of
different types as in draft-qu-mpls-mpls-msd-yang and there is an IANA registry
of types as well as differentiation between node and link MSD. Which does PCE
mean? Or should it join the crowd and have lists thereof?
-20 changes the reference for the IANA PCE flags. This change to IANA is by
draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-13 so I see that I-D as a
Normative Reference.
-20 adds two new flags. TCP-AO I see in the flags but nowhere else, no
reference, no feature, no explanation. Something needs adding and I would
expect that to include Security Considerations. Again this makes that lsr-pce
I-D a Normative Reference IMO.
p.11 Tree diagram seems to be missing a vertical bar where auth has been
slotted in
"Set to true if SR-MPLS is enabled
but where is this enablement? Not in RFC8664 AFAICT
"PCEP Association Global Source.";
I see
"PCEP Global Association Source.";
In RFC8697
[IANA-IGP] reference
Title seems short of a 'P'
Tom Petch
Regards,
Julien
On 26/09/2022 15:01, julien.meu...@orange.com wrote:
> Hi PCE WG,
>
> This message starts a 2-week WG Last Call for
> draft-ietf-pce-pcep-yang-19. Please review and share any feedback
> using the PCE mailing list.
> This WGLC will end on Tuesday October 11.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Julien
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
