Hi All,

I support it, I have read the latest version and it is ready for publication in 
my opinion. Scenarios to be addressed is described in RFC8735. Based on the 
progress of SRv6, I think SRv6 is an alternative solution.



Best Regards,
Zhenqiang Li

li_zhenqi...@hotmail.com
 
From: Dhruv Dhody
Date: 2023-05-17 06:15
To: pce
CC: pce-chairs; draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip
Subject: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-20
Hi WG, 

This email starts a 2-weeks working group last call for 
draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-20 [1].  

Please indicate your support or concern for this draft. If you are opposed to 
the progression of the draft to RFC, please articulate your concern. If you 
support it, please indicate that you have read the latest version and it is 
ready for publication in your opinion. As always, review comments and nits are 
most welcome.

The WG LC will end on Wednesday 31st May 2023. We will also notify the IDR WG 
about this WGLC.

A general reminder to the WG to be more vocal during the last-call/adoption and 
help us unclog our queues :)  

Thanks,
Dhruv & Julien

[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip/
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Reply via email to