Dhruv,

I was almost ready to send a mail to the same effect, when I got this. This is the right approach.

I have something we might want to consider. If you add this to the charter:

    "Further, the PCE WG also handle protocol extensions for new
     path setup types of Segment Routing (SR), BIER, and Detnet."

Do we also want to to add content to the bullets under "Work items"? Today we have:

   "In cooperation with protocol specific Working Group (e.g., MPLS,
    CCAMP), development of LSP signaling (RSVP-TE) extensions required
    to support PCE-based path computation models."

Do we want to extend the list with SPRING, BIER and DETNET?


/Loa

On 2023-07-07 12:02, Dhruv Dhody wrote:
Hi Aijun,

Two things,

(1) We dont want a charter that is open-ended with the proposed text "...and other possible forward data plane"; the correct thing to do would be to do a quick recharter when we have something new. (2) Instead of adding a Native-IP in that list, we suggest using the term CCDR and club this with PCECC with this change -

OLD:
- In cooperation with the TEAS Working Group, development of PCE-
   based architectures for Traffic Engineering including PCE as a
   Central Controller (PCECC). The PCEP extensions are developed in
   the PCE Working Group.
NEW:
- In cooperation with the TEAS Working Group, development of PCE-
   based architectures for Traffic Engineering including PCE as a
   Central Controller (PCECC) and Central Control Dynamic Routing
(CCDR). The PCEP extensions are developed inthe PCE Working
Group.
END

I made this change in GitHub - https://github.com/ietf-wg-pce/charter/tree/main <https://github.com/ietf-wg-pce/charter/tree/main>

Thanks!
Dhruv & Julien

On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 6:47 AM Aijun Wang <wangai...@tsinghua.org.cn <mailto:wangai...@tsinghua.org.cn>> wrote:

    Hi, Dhruv:____

    __ __

    I recommend the following changes to the current charter:____

    __ __

    __1)__Further, the PCE WG also handle protocol extensions for new
    path setup types of Segment Routing (SR), BIER, and Detnet.____

    èFurther, the PCE WG also handle protocol extensions for new path
    setup types of Segment Routing (SR), Native IP, BIER, Detnet and
    other possible forward data plane.____

    2)Add one items in the “Milestone”____

    èJuly 2023 Submit PCEP extension for Native IP as a Proposed
    Standard____

    __ __

    Thanks in advance.____

    __ __

    Best Regards____

    __ __

    Aijun Wang____

    China Telecom____

    __ __

    *发件人:*pce-boun...@ietf.org <mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org>
    [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org <mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org>] *代表
    *Dhruv Dhody
    *发送时间:*2023年7月4日13:15
    *收件人:*pce@ietf.org <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
    *主题:*Re: [Pce] Proposed PCE WG Charter update____

    __ __

    Hi WG, ____

    __ __

    A gentle reminder for your comments on the proposed text for
    recharter! ____

    We can also use a few "I have read the proposed charter update text
    and I support rechartering!" :)____

    __ __

    Thanks! ____

    Dhruv____

    __ __

    On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 11:07 AM Dhruv Dhody <d...@dhruvdhody.com
    <mailto:d...@dhruvdhody.com>> wrote:____

        Hi WG, ____

        __ __

        The PCE WG charter (-07) was last updated in 2014. Your chairs
        and AD discussed the need to bring the charter up to date. We
        have made a proposed small update (-08) and placed it in our
        WG's Github - https://github.com/ietf-wg-pce/charter
        <https://github.com/ietf-wg-pce/charter>____

        __ __

        A diff of the changes can be seen at -
        
https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url1=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ietf-wg-pce/charter/main/charter-ietf-pce-07.txt&difftype=--html&url2=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ietf-wg-pce/charter/main/charter-ietf-pce-08.txt
 
<https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url1=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ietf-wg-pce/charter/main/charter-ietf-pce-07.txt&difftype=--html&url2=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ietf-wg-pce/charter/main/charter-ietf-pce-08.txt>____

        __ __

        We request the WG to review the proposed charter update. We
        suggest using the mailing list for discussion and proposing
        substantial changes. Minor edits may also be suggested via PR
        directly on the GitHub. ____

        __ __

        Please provide all your comments before 5th July. We would then
        forward the request to our AD. ____

        __ __

        Thanks! ____

        Dhruv & Julien____


_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

--
Loa Andersson                        email: l...@pi.nu
Senior MPLS Expert                          loa.pi...@gmail.com
Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Reply via email to