Hi all,
 
Sorry for the late reply.
I read the draft and fully support it adoption.
I  conduct a lot of PCEP testing with different vendors equipment and our in-house PCE, it would be much easier if such vendor-specific info will be sent in  the Vendor Information TLV as a single source of information.
 
SY,
Boris
 
20.06.2023, 10:46, "julien.meu...@orange.com" <julien.meu...@orange.com>:

Hi all,

It has been a while since draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-vendor started to
document how to extend the scope of RFC 7470. It is now time to consider
its adoption by the WG.
Do you think draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-vendor-16 [1] is ready to
become a PCE work item? Please express your support and/or concerns
using the mailing list.

Thanks,

Dhruv & Julien


[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-vendor
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Reply via email to