Hi Julien & Dhruv, Many thanks for your work, we have uploaded the 00 revision draft. Will address the comments in 01 very soon, and I think we may not receive too many comments. The proposed update will be shared in Github, and send to the ML before submitting.
The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-vendor/ There is also an HTML version available at: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-vendor-00.html Thanks, Li Cheng -----Original Message----- From: Pce <pce-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of julien.meu...@orange.com Sent: Monday, July 17, 2023 9:03 PM To: pce@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-vendor Hi PCE WG, We have clear support to adopt this work as a WG item. Thank you, all. @Authors: Please submit the I-D as draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-vendor-00 when the submission tool reopens (starting next Saturday). Cheers, Dhruv & Julien On 20/06/2023 09:46, Julien Meuric wrote: > Hi all, > > It has been a while since draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-vendor started > to document how to extend the scope of RFC 7470. It is now time to > consider its adoption by the WG. > Do you think draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-vendor-16 [1] is ready to > become a PCE work item? Please express your support and/or concerns > using the mailing list. > > Thanks, > > Dhruv & Julien > > > [1] > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-vendor _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
