Hi PCE, I support the WGLC. The draft is simple but useful, we should move it to RFC very fast.
Some editorial comments: 0. Title of this draft is unclear, what is update of PCEPS. Good to explain more clear. 1. Abstract: This document updates RFC 8253 to address support requirements for TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3 and the use of TLS 1.3's early data. Address? To many meanings for this word, we may change it by another? Describe? Same for the one in introduction. 2. Section 4. I think the name of this section is not clear. This section describes the requirements in implementation. Should change to Requirements? However, section use Early Data as a title, then we should add a section called requirements and move section 3 and 4 into this section? 3.Section 4 Implementations MUST support TLS 1.2 [RFC5246] and are REQUIRED to support the TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 cipher suite [RFC9325]. __NEW__ Implementations MUST support TLS 1.2 [RFC5246] and the TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 cipher suite [RFC9325]. 4. Implementations SHOULD support TLS 1.3 [I-D.ietf-tls-rfc8446bis] and, if implemented, MUST prefer to negotiate TLS 1.3 over earlier versions of TLS. If a SHOULD is used here, then I do not see the value of this draft. I suggest to use MUST here. Unless some features in the draft is not in the scope of TLS1.3. So we don’t need to assume the case of supporting TLS1.3. 5. Section 5 The Security Considerations of PCEP [RFC5440], [RFC8231], [RFC8281], and [RFC8283]; TLS 1.2 [RFC5246]; TLS 1.3 [I-D.ietf-tls-rfc8446bis], and; [RFC9325] apply here as well. __NEW__ The Security Considerations of PCEP [RFC5440], [RFC8231], [RFC8281], and [RFC8283]; TLS 1.2 [RFC5246]; TLS 1.3 [I-D.ietf-tls-rfc8446bis], and; [RFC9325] apply to this document as well. I am not sure that the second paragraph should be added or it will be better to add into the introduction? The rest looks good to me. Many thanks, Cheng -----Original Message----- From: Pce <pce-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of julien.meu...@orange.com Sent: Tuesday, September 5, 2023 11:10 AM To: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-pceps-tls13-01 Dear PCE WG, This message starts a 2-week WG last call on draft-ietf-pce-pceps-tls13-01 [1]. Please, be express any comments you have about this document using the PCE mailing list. This WGLC will end on Wednesday 20th September 2023. Thanks, Julien -- [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-pceps-tls13/ _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
