Hi Cheng, Sorry it’s taken me so long to get back to this. Stephane’s comment resulted in a fair number of changes. It short I recast the draft to focus much more on your 0 comment. Now it’s a little more clear about what’s being added. Just two things that I highlighted in my message to the list: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/5EBnkSeD5q7c55V9e2PfnIY88-0/
Cheers, spt > On Sep 13, 2023, at 09:06, Cheng Li <c...@huawei.com> wrote: > > Hi PCE, > > I support the WGLC. The draft is simple but useful, we should move it to RFC > very fast. > > Some editorial comments: > > 0. Title of this draft is unclear, what is update of PCEPS. Good to explain > more clear. > > 1. Abstract: > This document updates RFC 8253 to address support requirements for TLS 1.2 > and TLS 1.3 and the use of TLS 1.3's early data. > > Address? To many meanings for this word, we may change it by another? > Describe? Same for the one in introduction. > > 2. Section 4. > I think the name of this section is not clear. This section describes the > requirements in implementation. Should change to Requirements? > However, section use Early Data as a title, then we should add a section > called requirements and move section 3 and 4 into this section? > > 3.Section 4 > Implementations MUST support TLS 1.2 [RFC5246] and are REQUIRED to support > the TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 cipher suite [RFC9325]. > > __NEW__ > Implementations MUST support TLS 1.2 [RFC5246] and the > TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 cipher suite [RFC9325]. > > 4. > Implementations SHOULD support TLS 1.3 [I-D.ietf-tls-rfc8446bis] and, if > implemented, MUST prefer to negotiate TLS 1.3 over earlier versions of TLS. > > If a SHOULD is used here, then I do not see the value of this draft. I > suggest to use MUST here. Unless some features in the draft is not in the > scope of TLS1.3. > So we don’t need to assume the case of supporting TLS1.3. > > 5. Section 5 > > The Security Considerations of PCEP [RFC5440], [RFC8231], [RFC8281], and > [RFC8283]; TLS 1.2 [RFC5246]; TLS 1.3 [I-D.ietf-tls-rfc8446bis], and; > [RFC9325] apply here as well. > > __NEW__ > The Security Considerations of PCEP [RFC5440], [RFC8231], [RFC8281], and > [RFC8283]; TLS 1.2 [RFC5246]; TLS 1.3 [I-D.ietf-tls-rfc8446bis], and; > [RFC9325] apply to this document as well. > > I am not sure that the second paragraph should be added or it will be better > to add into the introduction? > > The rest looks good to me. > > Many thanks, > Cheng > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Pce <pce-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of julien.meu...@orange.com > Sent: Tuesday, September 5, 2023 11:10 AM > To: pce@ietf.org > Subject: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-pceps-tls13-01 > > Dear PCE WG, > > This message starts a 2-week WG last call on > draft-ietf-pce-pceps-tls13-01 [1]. Please, be express any comments you have > about this document using the PCE mailing list. > > This WGLC will end on Wednesday 20th September 2023. > > Thanks, > > Julien > > -- > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-pceps-tls13/ > _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
