Dear WG, I support WG adoption of this work. This work has had a long history and has matured and I believe is ready to be progressed. I believe that PCEP-LS would be valuable for operators and is not much change if using PCE CC centralized SDN controller.
Thanks Gyan On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 12:18 PM <julien.meu...@orange.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > We have a long history around PCEP-LS. The rough consensus has been to > progress it as experimental within the PCE WG, which makes more sense > than an independent submission. > As a result, do you support draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls-27 [1] to become > a PCE WG document? Please share your feedback using the PCE mailing > list, including your comments and especially your rationales in case > you're opposed. > > Thank you, > > Julien > > --- > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls/ > > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > Pce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce >
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
