Dear WG,

I support WG adoption of this work.  This work has had a long history and
has matured and I believe is ready to  be progressed.  I believe that
PCEP-LS would be valuable for operators and is not much change if using PCE
CC centralized SDN controller.

Thanks


Gyan

On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 12:18 PM <julien.meu...@orange.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> We have a long history around PCEP-LS. The rough consensus has been to
> progress it as experimental within the PCE WG, which makes more sense
> than an independent submission.
> As a result, do you support draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls-27 [1] to become
> a PCE WG document? Please share your feedback using the PCE mailing
> list, including your comments and especially your rationales in case
> you're opposed.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Julien
>
> ---
> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
>
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Reply via email to