Hi all,

Though not so loud, we have some expressed interest for this I-D and no objection. Since it's an extension of the PCECC work already within the WG's scope, we can adopt it.

@Authors, please submit the I-D as draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-pce-controller-p2mp-00.

Thanks,

Julien


On 19/05/2025 16:23:21 [email protected], wrote:
Hi all,

This is an adoption poll for draft-dhody-pce-pcep-extension-pce-controller-p2mp-14 [1]. WG, do you think that the aforementioned I-D is ready to serve as a foundation for a PCE WG item?

Please use the PCE mailing list to express your support or your reasons to be opposed.

Thanks,

Julien

--
[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhody-pce-pcep-extension-pce-controller-p2mp/

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: Signature cryptographique S/MIME

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to