Eric,
Glad to see that we agree.
Lou
At 03:10 PM 10/18/2005, Gray, Eric wrote:
Lou,
While I don't understand how the quote you provide impacts on
the issue of using (or defining) PCE to work in the single domain
case, I agree (having just talked to Adrian) that we have to allow
that it might be employed for this purpose.
Ideally - however - in the single domain case, the solution
we come up with degenerate to something very like a traffic engineer
application. The reason why this is true is fairly obvious - the
problem domains are practically identical and the primary driver for
PCE in the first place was the need to determine how to properly do
a traffic engineering like function in a multi-domain environment.
--
Eric
--> -----Original Message-----
--> From: Lou Berger [<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--> Sent: Saturday, October 15, 2005 10:57 AM
--> To: Gray, Eric
--> Cc: Ash, Gerald R (Jerry), ALABS; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--> Subject: RE: [Pce] WG Last Call ended on
--> draft-ietf-pce-architecture-02.txt
-->
-->
-->
--> At 06:06 PM 10/14/2005, Gray, Eric wrote:
--> >Lou,
--> >
--> > What would be the point? Then it is merely a traffic
--> >engineer application.
--> >
--> >--
--> >Eric
-->
--> Eric,
--> The PCE Architecture doesn't limit PCE to multi-domain
--> networks. to quote:
--> "... Path computation in large, multi-domain, multi-region or
--> multi-layer networks is complex and may require special
--> computational components and cooperation between the different
--> network domains."
-->
--> Lou
-->
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
