> -----Original Message----- > From: Adrian Farrel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 10:08 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Pce] Poll on three new working group I-Ds > > Hi, > > Resulting from the discussions in Montreal, we would like to > take your opinions on the adoption of three I-Ds as working > group drafts. > > draft-bitar-zhang-interas-pcecp-reqs-01.txt > This draft sets out the requirements for PCEP in an inter-AS > scenario. It has been refined considerably over the last > couple of iterations and is now limited to just the > requirements for this situation. We may need to do more work > on it as a WG document, but the authors and chairs believe it > is in good enough shape to be the basis of the WG work. >
Yes, > draft-bryskin-pce-policy-enabled-path-comp-02.txt > Policy forms part of the PCE architecture, and this document > fleshes out the details of the use of policy in a PCE context. > There was some discussion in Montreal about whether to wait > to include details of policy for recovery path computation, > but the chairs feel that this scenarion (and any other > relevant scenarios) can be safely added once the I-D is a > working group draft. Further, there was support from the > service providers in the room in Montreal for adopting this I-D. > I would like to wait to include details of policy. > draft-vasseur-pce-brpc-00.txt > This draft describes an application procedure for PCE in the > inter-domain case. Yes, > There has been some discussion of this draft on the mailing > list resulting in the request for a few clarifications of > scope and procedure, and also an explicit mention of the Path > Key ID option. > Since JP is the lead author on this work, I think that the > correct procedure is for JP to make a quick update before > this becomes a WG I-D, but while we are polling I would like > to ask your opinion on this I-D assuming that JP makes the > necessary changes. > > Simple Yes and No answers will do, but reasons are always helpful. > > Cheers, > Adrian > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > [email protected] > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce > _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
