Hi Adrian,

Yes for these three IDs.

Regards,

JL

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Adrian Farrel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Envoyé : mercredi 19 juillet 2006 16:08
> À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Objet : [Pce] Poll on three new working group I-Ds
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Resulting from the discussions in Montreal, we would like to 
> take your opinions on the adoption of three I-Ds as working 
> group drafts.
> 
> draft-bitar-zhang-interas-pcecp-reqs-01.txt
> This draft sets out the requirements for PCEP in an inter-AS 
> scenario. It has been refined considerably over the last 
> couple of iterations and is now limited to just the 
> requirements for this situation. We may need to do more work 
> on it as a WG document, but the authors and chairs believe it 
> is in good enough shape to be the basis of the WG work.
> 
> draft-bryskin-pce-policy-enabled-path-comp-02.txt
> Policy forms part of the PCE architecture, and this document 
> fleshes out the details of the use of policy in a PCE context.
> There was some discussion in Montreal about whether to wait 
> to include details of policy for recovery path computation, 
> but the chairs feel that this scenarion (and any other 
> relevant scenarios) can be safely added once the I-D is a 
> working group draft. Further, there was support from the 
> service providers in the room in Montreal for adopting this I-D.
> 
> draft-vasseur-pce-brpc-00.txt
> This draft describes an application procedure for PCE in the 
> inter-domain case.
> There has been some discussion of this draft on the mailing 
> list resulting in the request for a few clarifications of 
> scope and procedure, and also an explicit mention of the Path 
> Key ID option.
> Since JP is the lead author on this work, I think that the 
> correct procedure is for JP to make a quick update before 
> this becomes a WG I-D, but while we are polling I would like 
> to ask your opinion on this I-D assuming that JP makes the 
> necessary changes.
> 
> Simple Yes and No answers will do, but reasons are always helpful.
> 
> Cheers,
> Adrian
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
> 

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Reply via email to