> Because, this ID does have some implication on (current and future) > PCE WG IDs, I'd welcome feed-back on adopting this ID as a WG > document.
Question on the ultimate intent of this draft http://ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-farrel-pce-manageability-requireme nts-02.txt: Is the goal to only apply the requirements to the PCE WG drafts or to the IETF as a whole? It appears the intent is to restrict to the PCE WG and hope that other WGs apply in the future. If we adopt this process just for the PCE WG, what becomes of the revised process after the PCE WG completes its work and is disbanded? Process experiments are run according to RFC 3933 http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3933.txt?number=3933, and AFAIK are intended to be applied to IETF-wide processes. Thanks, Jerry _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
