JP, Adrian, WG I strongly support this document as PCE WG item and for general WG draft use.
I wonder if in the 3.x section it might be useful to optionally break out a legacy protocol interworking & native backward compatibility implications subsection to briefly call attention to their management problem spaces. I see the topic could fall under '3.5 Requirements on Other Protocols' however I perceive from the text of that section that the focus is really upon protocols that are impacted or required by the proposed protocol, not necessarily older cousins that perform a similar function and might pose a manageability problem worth reflecting upon. Matthew Meyer On 1/12/07, JP Vasseur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dear WG, We had so far a few (and positive) feed-backs, it would be nice to get more feed-back on this (in particular several of the usual contributors haven't expressed their opinion). Thanks. Happy New Year to all of you. JP. Begin forwarded message: From: JP Vasseur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: January 3, 2007 1:12:59 PM EST To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: "Dan \(\(Dan\)\) Romascanu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [Pce] WG Feed-back required on draft-farrel-pce-manageability-requirements-02.txt Dear WG, The idea of adding a Manageability section to IDs was first introduced by Adrian and discussed at IETF-65 Dallas March 2006 (for reference, see the WG minutes) since then two revisions of draft-farrel-pce-manageability-requirements have been published based on the comments received from members of the PCE WG and OPS ADs. My recollection of the discussions about this ID is a general good support from members of the PCE WG and OPS AD (thanks to Dan for his help). The were some concerns from Lou that have been addressed in the latest revision of the draft. Furthermore, there are several IDs in the works for which the authors agreed to add a manageability section and "experiment" the process that may have to be tuned as we'll move forward. Because, this ID does have some implication on (current and future) PCE WG IDs, I'd welcome feed-back on adopting this ID as a WG document. Thanks. JP. _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
