On Mar 7, 2007, at 8:36 PM, Wenhu Lu wrote:
JP Vasseur wrote:
Hi,
On Mar 6, 2007, at 8:18 PM, Wenhu Lu wrote:
Hi Jean-Louis,
It came to my attention that the acronym PCEP was used throughout
this draft
whereas the acronym PCECP was used in drafts such as this one -
_PCE Communication Protocol (PCECP) Specific Requirements for
Inter-Area Multi Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) and Generalized
MPLS (GMPLS) Traffic Engineering <http://www.ietf.org/internet-
drafts/draft-ietf-pce-pcecp-interarea-reqs-05.txt> (26301 bytes)._
Are these two acronyms going to converge at some time?
The term PCECP is used in the requirement drafts because they
refer to requirements for *a* PCE Communication Protocol: PCEP is
the protocol that has been defined.
Hope this clarifies.
Thank you JP, point taken.
I'm a little bit concerned about the symmetries of PCED and PCEP.
It's not as easy in relating "Communication" to PCEP as "Discovery"
to PCED.
Maybe I missed something.
Not sure to see what you're concerned about ?
JP.
Regards,
-wenhu
JP.
Regards,
-wenhu
LE ROUX Jean-Louis RD-CORE-LAN wrote:
Hi all,
This new draft defines PCED and PCEP extensions for the encoding
of objective functions.
We are waiting for WG feedback/comments.
_http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-leroux-pce-of-00.txt_
Regards,
JL
-------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
