Yes to both.
On Aug 12, 2007, at 11:31 AM, Adrian Farrel wrote:
Hi,
The meeting in Chicago was broadly in support of adopting two I-Ds
as working group drafts:
- Encoding of Objective Functions in Path Computation Element (PCE)
communication and discovery protocols
draft-leroux-pce-of-01.txt
- Diff-Serv Aware Class Type Object for Path Computation Element
Communication Protocol draft-sivabalan-pce-dste-01.txt
Can you please indicate your opinion.
Now that the inter-AS requirements work is stable, the authors of
two I-Ds related to the use of PCE for P2MP path computations
(Adrian is one of the authors) have asked us to look at adopting
this work. We think that a little more discussion is needed first,
and have asked them to present the I-Ds in Vancouver so that we can
make a decision immediately afterwards. Please have a look at the I-
Ds and send your comments to the mailing list.
- PCC-PCE Communication Requirements for Point to Multipoint
Multiprotocol Label Switching Traffic Engineering (MPLS-TE)
draft-yasukawa-pce-p2mp-req-02.txt
- Applicability of the Path Computation Element (PCE) to
Point-to-Multipoint (P2MP) Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS)
and Generalized MPLS (GMPLS) Traffic Engineering (TE)
draft-yasukawa-pce-p2mp-app-00.txt
Thanks,
JP and Adrian
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
