j-p simple question: why only the policy doc. ?
why are the other documents not liaised to IP Sphere ? or you would like to reserve a specific treatment to the policy document (the enabler of the whole stuff at the inter-domain level) ? -d. > -----Original Message----- > From: JP Vasseur [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 8:10 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Lou Berger; Igor Bryskin; Dimitri > Papadimitriou; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: Thomas Walsh; JACQUENET Christian RD-TCH-REN > Subject: [Pce] Update on draft-ietf-pce-policy-enabled-path-comp > > Dear WG, > > From the WG minutes of the IETF-69 meeting: > > > 12) Update on Policy-Enabled Path Computation Framework > draft-ietf-pce-policy-enabled-path-comp-01.txt (Lou - 5mn) [110] > > > Lou> ready for Last Call > JP> It sounds ready. Suggestion: offer IPSphere to have a > look at the doc before last call. JP will be the point > of contact. Asked Ross whether this is a good idea, and Ross > agreed. Once comments are received, last call. > Adrian> OK, but this is not an indefinite consultation. We > want to be able to move ahead and complete the I-D > relatively soon. > > We have contacted IPSphere and RA WG of IPSphere should > provide us some feed-back by > mid-October. I have copied Tom Walsh and Christian Jacquenet > (chair of the RAWG) IPSphere. > > Thanks. > > JP. > _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
