hi j-p just wanted to know why only this document. i do not have any specific objection in accommodating comments from the IP Sphere in case they are valuable of course.
-d. > -----Original Message----- > From: JP Vasseur [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 12:08 AM > To: PAPADIMITRIOU Dimitri > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Lou Berger; Igor Bryskin; Dimitri > Papadimitriou; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Adrian Farrel; Thomas > Walsh; JACQUENET Christian RD-TCH-REN > Subject: Re: [Pce] Update on draft-ietf-pce-policy-enabled-path-comp > > Hi Dimitri, > > On Sep 18, 2007, at 4:04 PM, PAPADIMITRIOU Dimitri wrote: > > > j-p > > > > simple question: why only the policy doc. ? > > > > why are the other documents not liaised to IP Sphere ? or > you would > > like > > to reserve a specific treatment to the policy document (the > enabler of > > the whole stuff at the inter-domain level) ? > > > > As discussed during the last PCE IETF meeting and as reported in the > minutes, > the idea was simply to see whether IPSphere might have comments/feed- > backs > to provide. There is no "specific treatment", the idea of > seeking for > comments from > IPSphere on this document is motivated by the fact that they are > actively working > on policy. This is not a formal liaison, just a proposal for comments. > Note that the goal is to not delay the progress of document by all > means (thus the > dead-line for comments (mid-October). > > Thanks. > > JP. > > > -d. > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: JP Vasseur [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 8:10 PM > >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Lou Berger; Igor Bryskin; Dimitri > >> Papadimitriou; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Cc: Thomas Walsh; JACQUENET Christian RD-TCH-REN > >> Subject: [Pce] Update on draft-ietf-pce-policy-enabled-path-comp > >> > >> Dear WG, > >> > >> From the WG minutes of the IETF-69 meeting: > >> > >> > >> 12) Update on Policy-Enabled Path Computation Framework > >> draft-ietf-pce-policy-enabled-path-comp-01.txt (Lou - 5mn) [110] > >> > >> > >> Lou> ready for Last Call > >> JP> It sounds ready. Suggestion: offer IPSphere to have a > >> look at the doc before last call. JP will be the point > >> of contact. Asked Ross whether this is a good idea, and Ross > >> agreed. Once comments are received, last call. > >> Adrian> OK, but this is not an indefinite consultation. We > >> want to be able to move ahead and complete the I-D > >> relatively soon. > >> > >> We have contacted IPSphere and RA WG of IPSphere should > >> provide us some feed-back by > >> mid-October. I have copied Tom Walsh and Christian Jacquenet > >> (chair of the RAWG) IPSphere. > >> > >> Thanks. > >> > >> JP. > >> > _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
