Benjamin Berry wrote:

> It could be confused because the G3 is based off the 603 not the 604.  
> though its probably just because the system isn't recognizing your 
> cpu  type correctly.
>
> On Jan 23, 2005, at 2:25 PM, vicki Duggan wrote:
>
>> Hi Colin.
>>
>> You say in your mail that OSX 10.1 supports 603/604 cpu's, but the 
>> cpu  in my 3400 in the about X box shows as a G3 not PPc.(before i 
>> get  screamed at ) I know the cpu in my 3400 is a 603 and not a G3, 
>> but i  just wondered if X 10.1 does support 603/604 why does it not 
>> report  them right? and why doe's it say that they are G3. \
>
If the G3 is indeed a revision of the 603, then it makes sense that it 
would be reported as such.  Why not report it as a 603?  Simple, OS X 
was designed for G3-native machines, not our second-gen Power Macs.  
Therefore, it assumes that it would not be able to be installed on a 
603/604-based system and assumes the processor to be a G3.

Even though Apple says that OS X will only run on a native G3 or G4 
system, they bothered to include 603/604 code in versions up to 10.1.5 
(so I hear).  Makes me wonder if they're secretly supporting XPostFacto 
to get a few more sales of OS X and OS X apps from the second-gen Power 
Mac crowd... hmm...

--
Colin


-- 
PCI-PowerMacs is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> and...

 Small Dog Electronics    http://www.smalldog.com  | Refurbished Drives |
 -- Sonnet & PowerLogix Upgrades - start at $169   |  & CDRWs on Sale!  |

      Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html>

PCI-PowerMacs list info: <http://lowendmac.com/lists/pci-powermacs.shtml>
  --> AOL users, remove "mailto:";
Send list messages to:   <mailto:[email protected]>
To unsubscribe, email:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For digest mode, email:  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subscription questions:  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Archive:<http://www.mail-archive.com/pci-powermacs%40mail.maclaunch.com/>

iPod Accessories for Less
at 1-800-iPOD.COM
Fast Delivery, Low Price, Good Deal
www.1800ipod.com

Reply via email to