pcre-dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [pcre-dev] (*SKIP:NAME) when (*MARK:NAME) is in assertion ph10
  • Re: [pcre-dev] (*SKIP:NAME) when (*MARK:NAME) is in assertion ND via Pcre-dev
  • Re: [pcre-dev] (*SKIP:NAME) when (*MARK:NAME) is in assertion ph10
  • Re: [pcre-dev] (*SKIP:NAME) when (*MARK:NAME) is in assertion ND via Pcre-dev
  • Re: [pcre-dev] (*SKIP:NAME) when (*MARK:NAME) is in assertion ph10
  • Re: [pcre-dev] (*SKIP:NAME) when (*MARK:NAME) is in assertion ph10
  • Re: [pcre-dev] (*SKIP:NAME) when (*MARK:NAME) is in assertion ND via Pcre-dev
  • Re: [pcre-dev] (*SKIP:NAME) when (*MARK:NAME) is in assertion ph10
  • Re: [pcre-dev] (*SKIP:NAME) when (*MARK:NAME) is in assertion ND via Pcre-dev
  • Re: [pcre-dev] (*SKIP:NAME) when (*MARK:NAME) is in assertion ph10
  • Re: [pcre-dev] (*SKIP:NAME) when (*MARK:NAME) is in assertion ND via Pcre-dev
  • Re: [pcre-dev] (*SKIP:NAME) when (*MARK:NAME) is in assertion ph10
  • Re: [pcre-dev] (*SKIP:NAME) when (*MARK:NAME) is in assertion ND via Pcre-dev
  • Re: [pcre-dev] (*SKIP:NAME) when (*MARK:NAME) is in assertion ph10
  • Re: [pcre-dev] (*SKIP:NAME) when (*MARK:NAME) is in assertion ND via Pcre-dev
  • Re: [pcre-dev] (*SKIP:NAME) when (*MARK:NAME) is in assertion ph10
  • Re: [pcre-dev] (*SKIP:NAME) when (*MARK:NAME) is in assertion ph10
• [pcre-dev] No capture in nested negative assertions ND via Pcre-dev
  • Re: [pcre-dev] No capture in nested negative assertions ph10
  • Re: [pcre-dev] No capture in nested negative assertions ND via Pcre-dev
  • Re: [pcre-dev] No capture in nested negative assertions ph10
  • Re: [pcre-dev] No capture in nested negative assertions ND via Pcre-dev
  • Re: [pcre-dev] No capture in nested negative assertions ND via Pcre-dev
  • Re: [pcre-dev] No capture in nested negative assertions ph10
  • Re: [pcre-dev] No capture in nested negative assertions ND via Pcre-dev
• [pcre-dev] Bactracking controls in subroutines ND via Pcre-dev
  • Re: [pcre-dev] Bactracking controls in subroutines ph10
  • Re: [pcre-dev] Bactracking controls in subroutines ph10
  • Re: [pcre-dev] Bactracking controls in subroutines ND via Pcre-dev
• [pcre-dev] Checking the PCRE2 version not work as expected ND via Pcre-dev
  • Re: [pcre-dev] Checking the PCRE2 version not work as expected ph10
  • Re: [pcre-dev] Checking the PCRE2 version not work as expected Giuseppe D'Angelo via Pcre-dev
  • Re: [pcre-dev] Checking the PCRE2 version not work as expected ph10
• [pcre-dev] Quantified assertions inside lookbehind assertion cause error ND via Pcre-dev
  • Re: [pcre-dev] Quantified assertions inside lookbehind assertion cause error ph10
  • Re: [pcre-dev] Quantified assertions inside lookbehind assertion cause error ND via Pcre-dev
  • Re: [pcre-dev] Quantified assertions inside lookbehind assertion cause error ph10
• [pcre-dev] Anchored patterns doesn't match with \K in lookbehind ND via Pcre-dev
  • Re: [pcre-dev] Anchored patterns doesn't match with \K in lookbehind ph10
  • Re: [pcre-dev] Anchored patterns doesn't match with \K in lookbehind ND via Pcre-dev
  • Re: [pcre-dev] Anchored patterns doesn't match with \K in lookbehind ph10
• [pcre-dev] [Bug 2285] New: Document tolerance for null pointers in specific function parameters admin
  • [pcre-dev] [Bug 2285] Document tolerance for null pointers in specific function parameters admin
  • [pcre-dev] [Bug 2285] Document tolerance for null pointers in specific function parameters admin
  • [pcre-dev] [Bug 2285] Document tolerance for null pointers in specific function parameters admin
  • [pcre-dev] [Bug 2285] Document tolerance for null pointers in specific function parameters admin
  • [pcre-dev] [Bug 2285] Document tolerance for null pointers in specific function parameters admin
  • [pcre-dev] [Bug 2285] Document tolerance for null pointers in specific function parameters admin
  • [pcre-dev] [Bug 2285] Document tolerance for null pointers in specific function parameters admin
  • [pcre-dev] [Bug 2285] Document tolerance for null pointers in specific function parameters admin
  • [pcre-dev] [Bug 2285] Document tolerance for null pointers in specific function parameters admin
• [pcre-dev] Serialization format versioning Daniel Richard G.
  • Re: [pcre-dev] Serialization format versioning ph10
  • Re: [pcre-dev] Serialization format versioning Daniel Richard G.
  • Re: [pcre-dev] Serialization format versioning Zoltán Herczeg
  • Re: [pcre-dev] Serialization format versioning Daniel Richard G.
  • Re: [pcre-dev] Serialization format versioning Zoltán Herczeg
  • Re: [pcre-dev] Serialization format versioning ph10
  • Re: [pcre-dev] Serialization format versioning Daniel Richard G.
  • Re: [pcre-dev] Serialization format versioning Ze'ev Atlas via Pcre-dev
  • Re: [pcre-dev] Serialization format versioning Giuseppe D'Angelo via Pcre-dev
  • Re: [pcre-dev] Serialization format versioning ph10
  • Re: [pcre-dev] Serialization format versioning Giuseppe D'Angelo via Pcre-dev
  • Re: [pcre-dev] Serialization format versioning ph10
  • Re: [pcre-dev] Serialization format versioning Giuseppe D'Angelo via Pcre-dev
  • Re: [pcre-dev] Serialization format versioning Zoltán Herczeg
  • Re: [pcre-dev] Serialization format versioning Daniel Richard G.
  • Re: [pcre-dev] Serialization format versioning ph10
  • Re: [pcre-dev] Serialization format versioning ph10
  • Re: [pcre-dev] Serialization format versioning Daniel Richard G.
• [pcre-dev] [Bug 2283] New: RE::error() is nonempty even if compilation succeeds admin
  • [pcre-dev] [Bug 2283] RE::error() is nonempty even if compilation succeeds admin
  • [pcre-dev] [Bug 2283] RE::error() is nonempty even if compilation succeeds admin
  • [pcre-dev] [Bug 2283] RE::error() is nonempty even if compilation succeeds admin
  • [pcre-dev] [Bug 2283] RE::error() is nonempty even if compilation succeeds admin
  • [pcre-dev] [Bug 2283] RE::error() is nonempty even if compilation succeeds admin
  • [pcre-dev] [Bug 2283] RE::error() is nonempty even if compilation succeeds admin
  • [pcre-dev] [Bug 2283] RE::error() is nonempty even if compilation succeeds admin
  • [pcre-dev] [Bug 2283] RE::error() is nonempty even if compilation succeeds admin
  • [pcre-dev] [Bug 2283] RE::error() is nonempty even if compilation succeeds admin
  • [pcre-dev] [Bug 2283] RE::error() is nonempty even if compilation succeeds admin
  • [pcre-dev] [Bug 2283] RE::error() is nonempty even if compilation succeeds admin
  • [pcre-dev] [Bug 2283] RE::error() is nonempty even if compilation succeeds admin
• [pcre-dev] [Bug 2279] New: Asking help for --include-dir successful usase admin
  • [pcre-dev] [Bug 2279] Asking help for --include-dir successful usase admin
• [pcre-dev] Unexpected result when zero-length global matching and pattern contains \G ND via Pcre-dev
  • Re: [pcre-dev] Unexpected result when zero-length global matching and pattern contains \G ph10
  • Re: [pcre-dev] Unexpected result when zero-length global matching and pattern contains \G ND via Pcre-dev
  • Re: [pcre-dev] Unexpected result when zero-length global matching and pattern contains \G ph10
  • Re: [pcre-dev] Unexpected result when zero-length global matching and pattern contains \G ND via Pcre-dev
  • Re: [pcre-dev] Unexpected result when zero-length global matching and pattern contains \G ND via Pcre-dev
  • Re: [pcre-dev] Unexpected result when zero-length global matching and pattern contains \G ph10
  • Re: [pcre-dev] Unexpected result when zero-length global matching and pattern contains \G ph10
• [pcre-dev] Memory overflow when using replace modifier upon pattern with \K in lookbehind assertion ND via Pcre-dev
  • Re: [pcre-dev] Memory overflow when using replace modifier upon pattern with \K in lookbehind assertion ph10
  • Re: [pcre-dev] Memory overflow when using replace modifier upon pattern with \K in lookbehind assertion ND via Pcre-dev
  • Re: [pcre-dev] Memory overflow when using replace modifier upon pattern with \K in lookbehind assertion ph10
• [pcre-dev] Announcing PCRE2 10.31 for z/OS Ze'ev Atlas via Pcre-dev
• [pcre-dev] Support for invalid UTF-8 strings? Milan Bouchet-Valat
  • Re: [pcre-dev] Support for invalid UTF-8 strings? ph10
  • Re: [pcre-dev] Support for invalid UTF-8 strings? Milan Bouchet-Valat
  • Re: [pcre-dev] Support for invalid UTF-8 strings? Ze'ev Atlas via Pcre-dev
  • Re: [pcre-dev] Support for invalid UTF-8 strings? Zoltán Herczeg
• [pcre-dev] [PATCH] PCRE2 on Windows Daniel Richard G.
  • Re: [pcre-dev] [PATCH] PCRE2 on Windows ph10
  • Re: [pcre-dev] [PATCH] PCRE2 on Windows ph10
  • Re: [pcre-dev] [PATCH] PCRE2 on Windows ph10
  • Re: [pcre-dev] [PATCH] PCRE2 on Windows Daniel Richard G.
  • Re: [pcre-dev] [PATCH] PCRE2 on Windows Daniel Richard G.
  • Re: [pcre-dev] [PATCH] PCRE2 on Windows ph10
  • Re: [pcre-dev] [PATCH] PCRE2 on Windows Daniel Richard G.
  • Re: [pcre-dev] [PATCH] PCRE2 on Windows ph10
  • Re: [pcre-dev] [PATCH] PCRE2 on Windows ph10
  • Re: [pcre-dev] [PATCH] PCRE2 on Windows ph10
  • Re: [pcre-dev] [PATCH] PCRE2 on Windows Daniel Richard G.
  • Re: [pcre-dev] [PATCH] PCRE2 on Windows ph10
  • Re: [pcre-dev] [PATCH] PCRE2 on Windows Daniel Richard G.
  • Re: [pcre-dev] [PATCH] PCRE2 on Windows ph10
  • Re: [pcre-dev] [PATCH] PCRE2 on Windows ph10
  • Re: [pcre-dev] [PATCH] PCRE2 on Windows ph10
  • Re: [pcre-dev] [PATCH] PCRE2 on Windows Daniel Richard G.
  • Re: [pcre-dev] [PATCH] PCRE2 on Windows ph10
  • Re: [pcre-dev] [PATCH] PCRE2 on Windows Daniel Richard G.
• [pcre-dev] PCRE1 8.42 released ph10
• [pcre-dev] [PATCH] pcre1 modify misleading error message Benjamin Chaney via Pcre-dev
  • Re: [pcre-dev] [PATCH] pcre1 modify misleading error message ph10
• [pcre-dev] [Bug 2254] New: MIPS JIT tests fail admin
  • [pcre-dev] [Bug 2254] MIPS JIT tests fail admin
  • [pcre-dev] [Bug 2254] MIPS JIT tests fail admin
  • [pcre-dev] [Bug 2254] MIPS JIT tests fail admin
  • [pcre-dev] [Bug 2254] MIPS JIT tests fail admin
  • [pcre-dev] [Bug 2254] MIPS JIT tests fail admin
  • [pcre-dev] [Bug 2254] MIPS JIT tests fail admin
  • [pcre-dev] [Bug 2254] MIPS JIT tests fail admin
• [pcre-dev] [Bug 2247] New: build failure on m68k admin
  • [pcre-dev] [Bug 2247] build failure on m68k admin
  • [pcre-dev] [Bug 2247] build failure on m68k admin
  • [pcre-dev] [Bug 2247] build failure on m68k admin
  • [pcre-dev] [Bug 2247] build failure on m68k admin
  • [pcre-dev] [Bug 2247] build failure on m68k admin
• [pcre-dev] [PATCH] Add configure flag for autodetection of JIT support. Shea Levy
  • Re: [pcre-dev] [PATCH] Add configure flag for autodetection of JIT support. ph10
  • Re: [pcre-dev] [PATCH] Add configure flag for autodetection of JIT support. Shea Levy
  • Re: [pcre-dev] [PATCH] Add configure flag for autodetection of JIT support. ph10
  • Re: [pcre-dev] [PATCH] Add configure flag for autodetection of JIT support. Shea Levy
• [pcre-dev] [Bug 2245] New: new operators request for beginning and end of file admin
  • [pcre-dev] [Bug 2245] new operators request for beginning and end of file admin
  • [pcre-dev] [Bug 2245] new operators request for beginning and end of file admin
  • [pcre-dev] [Bug 2245] new operators request for beginning and end of file admin
  • [pcre-dev] [Bug 2245] new operators request for beginning and end of file admin
  • [pcre-dev] [Bug 2245] new operators request for beginning and end of file admin
  • Re: [pcre-dev] [Bug 2245] new operators request for beginning and end of file Ze'ev Atlas via Pcre-dev
  • [pcre-dev] [Bug 2245] new operators request for beginning and end of file admin
  • [pcre-dev] [Bug 2245] new operators request for beginning and end of file admin
• [pcre-dev] PCRE 8.42 Release Candidate ph10
  • Re: [pcre-dev] PCRE 8.42 Release Candidate Petr Pisar via Pcre-dev
  • Re: [pcre-dev] PCRE 8.42 Release Candidate ph10
• [pcre-dev] [Bug 2244] New: pcreposix REG_STARTEND support is not quite right admin
  • [pcre-dev] [Bug 2244] pcreposix REG_STARTEND support is not quite right admin
• [pcre-dev] [Bug 2240] New: Failed build on MIPS ci20 with JIT support admin
  • [pcre-dev] [Bug 2240] Failed build on MIPS ci20 with JIT support admin
  • [pcre-dev] [Bug 2240] Failed build on MIPS ci20 with JIT support admin
  • [pcre-dev] [Bug 2240] Failed build on MIPS ci20 with JIT support admin
  • [pcre-dev] [Bug 2240] Failed build on MIPS ci20 with JIT support admin
  • [pcre-dev] [Bug 2240] Failed build on MIPS ci20 with JIT support admin
  • [pcre-dev] [Bug 2240] Failed build on MIPS ci20 with JIT support admin
• [pcre-dev] PCRE2 10.31 released ph10
  • Re: [pcre-dev] PCRE2 10.31 released Andrew Ho
• [pcre-dev] [Bug 2232] New: Whitespace after subpattern definition seems to disable backtracking admin
  • [pcre-dev] [Bug 2232] Whitespace after subpattern definition seems to disable backtracking admin
  • [pcre-dev] [Bug 2232] Whitespace after subpattern definition seems to disable backtracking admin
  • [pcre-dev] [Bug 2232] Whitespace after subpattern definition seems to disable backtracking admin
• [pcre-dev] [Bug 2227] New: Heap overflow in pchars() pcretest.c:204 admin
  • [pcre-dev] [Bug 2227] Heap overflow in pchars() pcretest.c:204 admin
• [pcre-dev] [Bug 2226] New: heap overflow in match src/pcre_exec.c:2311 admin
  • [pcre-dev] [Bug 2226] heap overflow in match src/pcre_exec.c:2311 admin
  • [pcre-dev] [Bug 2226] heap overflow in match src/pcre_exec.c:2311 admin
  • [pcre-dev] [Bug 2226] heap overflow in match src/pcre_exec.c:2311 admin
  • [pcre-dev] [Bug 2226] heap overflow in match src/pcre_exec.c:2311 admin
  • [pcre-dev] [Bug 2226] heap overflow in match src/pcre_exec.c:2311 admin
  • [pcre-dev] [Bug 2226] heap overflow in match src/pcre_exec.c:2311 admin
• [pcre-dev] HELP! CMake expert needed ph10
  • Re: [pcre-dev] HELP! CMake expert needed Giuseppe D'Angelo via Pcre-dev
  • Re: [pcre-dev] HELP! CMake expert needed ph10
• [pcre-dev] PCRE2 10.31-RC1 Release Candidate ph10
  • Re: [pcre-dev] PCRE2 10.31-RC1 Release Candidate Petr Pisar via Pcre-dev
  • Re: [pcre-dev] PCRE2 10.31-RC1 Release Candidate Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason via Pcre-dev
  • Re: [pcre-dev] PCRE2 10.31-RC1 Release Candidate ph10
• [pcre-dev] [Bug 2222] New: pcre2grep does not support searching for \0 via -f, even though pcre2 itself supports this admin
  • [pcre-dev] [Bug 2222] pcre2grep does not support searching for \0 via -f, even though pcre2 itself supports this admin
  • [pcre-dev] [Bug 2222] pcre2grep does not support searching for \0 via -f, even though pcre2 itself supports this admin
• [pcre-dev] Buganizer mails lost after Exim 4.90 upgrade Phil Pennock
• [pcre-dev] [Bug 2211] New: Possible bug in pcredemo when checking for an empty match with patterns involving \K in lookarounds admin
  • [pcre-dev] [Bug 2211] Possible bug in pcredemo when checking for an empty match with patterns involving \K in lookarounds admin
  • [pcre-dev] [Bug 2211] Possible bug in pcredemo when checking for an empty match with patterns involving \K in lookarounds admin
  • [pcre-dev] [Bug 2211] Possible bug in pcredemo when checking for an empty match with patterns involving \K in lookarounds admin
  • [pcre-dev] [Bug 2211] Possible bug in pcredemo when checking for an empty match with patterns involving \K in lookarounds admin
  • [pcre-dev] [Bug 2211] Possible bug in pcredemo when checking for an empty match with patterns involving \K in lookarounds admin
  • [pcre-dev] [Bug 2211] Possible bug in pcredemo when checking for an empty match with patterns involving \K in lookarounds admin
  • [pcre-dev] [Bug 2211] Possible bug in pcredemo when checking for an empty match with patterns involving \K in lookarounds admin

• Earlier messages
• Later messages