I didn't take you post the wrong way, there was no problem with 
it.  :-)  You however apparently took my post to ANOTHER 
person's reply, and seemed to think that was for you, when it 
was not--it was only for the person to whom I replied.  You 
need to not only look at the reply, but WHAT a reply is FOR and 
TO whom.

I understand you were only asking what the posts meant and/or 
what they were for, and I thought I replied to that with the 
appropriate information, ( 
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg12416.html 
 ) but you didn't reply to that email, you replied to another 
post meant that was a reply to someone else.  So, are you still 
not clear on their purpose?  Here's an example if you don't 
have one handy:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg12418.html

If not, maybe here:
http://secunia.com/secunia_research/
http://secunia.com/about_secunia_advisories/
-Clint

God Bless
Clint Hamilton, Owner
http://OrpheusComputing.com

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Harold B."


FROM a misunderstood reader (this is not directed to *only* 
Clint):

It amazes me how remarks can be picked up the wrong way; I 
thought my email
was clear. I'm not complaining about Clint's postings. As I 
said in my
remark, I have the highest regard for Clint's storehouse of 
computer
knowledge. I'm surprised it was picked up as a denigration of 
what he is
offering.

My point is that contrary to point 3 below, I have very little 
"sources" of
information or "knowledge" and that is why I was asking for 
some explanation
of what the Secunia posts were. Note that I didn't even know 
what to call
them so I used the term "support-o postings" (because I 
happened to see that
term on top of his last "secunia" post. I don't even know what 
that means.

Now from your remarks, I learn that it has something to do with 
computer
security. That's all I wanted to know. I know so little about 
this that I
don't even know how to use that information. And it's possible 
other people
are in the same boat. Fortunately, I don't think my system is 
compromised
but one never knows.

So Point 1 (see below), I'm not filtering anything. Point 2, I 
get the
PCWorks Digest and don't know what that has to do with archives 
(btw,
PCWorks archives is fantasitic; easy to find any earlier 
postings). Point 3
I already covered. And Point 4, nobody is asking for the 
"secunia" posts to
stop --- again, it was just that I didn't know what they are.

I'm repeating my original question below where I don't see 
where I said
anything derogatory about any of the good work that the very 
knowledgeable
people in PCWorks are doing; for you guys and girls (ladies?), 
I have the
highest respect. Why those two paragraphs were picked up as a 
complaint by
four people, I'll never know. --- Harold

FROM Clint:

> 1. No one is forcing you to read them. Set an email filter 
> for "Secunia"
> if you don't like them.

> 2. It's NOT MY FAULT that there is something wrong with the 
> archives.

> 3. Not EVERYONE has your "sources" of information or 
> "knowledge". Consider
> other members that do NOT have your "other sources".

> 4. As usual, no good deed goes unpunished; so, the hell with 
> it.


Original Posting:

>> Questoin for Clint (or anyone else who can help me). Dear 
>> Clint, I know
>> you are a storehouse of computer information, and are very 
>> helpful to the
>> group.
We all know that and appreciate it. But poor me does not 
understand what I
am supposed to be getting from your (for want of any name), 
your "Support-O"
postings.

>> They often have the same "look" and I am sure all have 
>> different
>> information, and important information. That's the problem; 
>> I don't know
what that information means. I know I am missing something so 
if you or
anyone can explain what I am missing, without thinking I am 
rude, please
enlighten me (and possibly other newbies in the group). Or am I 
the only
idiot here? --- Harold
============= PCWorks Mailing List =================
Don't see your post? Check our posting guidelines &
make sure you've followed proper posting procedures,
http://pcworkers.com/rules.htm
Contact list owner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Unsubscribing and other changes: http://pcworkers.com
=====================================================

Reply via email to