hi. Luke Iannini (pd) wrote: > Haha, please look at the first message in (or the subject of) this > thread... we have gone far off topic : )
ah yes, sorry for this. i was reading my email via a webmail interface and did not have the entire thread at hand. i usually use subjects to determine whether i should read the email now or later, and do not consider it a substantial part of the mail body itself. this is definitely my problem. > > Yes, the counter proposal bit was a jab at the fact that the lazy > consensus has been a bit too lazy, and if the consensus is that I am > rejected perhaps a counter-proposal (for my rejection) is needed to > confirm that, lazily. true. otoh, if i was to add you, whom am i going to add? probably i missed this information, but i am not going to search all lukes on sourceforge whether they are you or not. a username would be helpful. > > Finally, does anyone have any opinions on http://code.google.com as a > cantidate? It would perhaps lighten your load, IOhannes (in that you > wouldn't have to assemble the server at IEM). well, the server is assembled (it would be the puredata.info host). (i have already noted the pros and cons of hosting the svn at puredata.info; i think the main pro is, that we don't have to create another bunch of users on yet another site; since the community is so lazy when it comes to decisions i fear that it will also be a major pain to migrate people to a new provider (and sometimes i am a bit afraid of google)). but of course it would be an option to host it elsewhere mfg.asdr. IOhannes PS: if this post gets through 2 times, i apologize; was hittin send to early and tried to cancel... _______________________________________________ PD-dev mailing list PD-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
