Hi Hans, ID # is 1541432 Username is lukeiannini On 3/2/07, Hans-Christoph Steiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sorry, I thought you'd been added. What's your sourceforge ID? I > couldn't find it. > > .hc > > On Mar 1, 2007, at 3:04 PM, Luke Iannini (pd) wrote: > > > OK, well if this is not quite ready to be discussed, could someone at > > least add me to the dev list? (or write a counter proposal for my non > > admission : )) > > > > Thanks, > > Luke > > > > On 2/23/07, Luke Iannini (pd) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On 2/15/07, IOhannes m zmoelnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> carmen wrote: > >>>>> I'd also still be interested in getting us over to Subversion, if > >>>>> there is still a supportive group for this? I've maintained > >>>>> several > >>>>> SVN repos now, and feel a bit more up to the task of organizing > >>>>> the > >>>>> project. > >>> > >>> there are definitely a lot of supporters for this. > >>> i think the main problem (were we stopped last time) was to find a > >>> directory layout. > >>> otoh, the beauty about svn is, that the directory layout can be > >>> changed... > >>> > >>>> > >>>> i'd be more interested in moving us over to Git, so i can stop > >>>> getting these emails. > >>> > >>> why would "these" emails stop more if we were using Git than they > >>> would > >>> if we were using svn? > >>> > >>> personally i'd like to investigate about SVK (even though i have no > >>> experience with that) > >> I'd certainly be interested in checking out SVK. I have been in a > >> net-less situation many times where it would have been nice to be > >> able > >> to do a "check-in" locally before making a big change. It is very > >> similar to subversion (well, it is subversion, plus more), so I don't > >> think there would be too much additional use overhead. > >> > >> One benefit of SVN, on the other hand, is the wide choice of OS and > >> App integration tools, for example: TextMate and SCPlugin (as of the > >> recent update) integrate wonderfully with Subversion, as does > >> TortoiseSVN on Windows and I suppose VIM and SubCommander on Linux > >> (and probably others, haven't spend much time with svn clients > >> besides > >> stock CLI on linux, only servers). > >> > >> Finally there is the issue of converting the CVS; Tigris's CVStoSVN > >> has been around for quite some time and is really simple to get going > >> http://sam.zoy.org/writings/programming/svn2cvs.html. > >> > >> I'm not as sure about the SVK solution of > >> http://svk.bestpractical.com/view/MirrorVCP > >> But maybe we can just two-step it, once to SVN, then again to SVK. > >> > >> I'll grab SVK and give it an actual lookover. > >> <time passes> > >> Well, I haven't downloaded it yet, but I have done a lot of > >> reading on > >> it, and the general feeling I'm getting is that it is not quite > >> mature > >> enough that we should be moving to it yet... it looks like a very > >> cool > >> system but I'd feel safer making the smaller step to Subversion > >> first, > >> then maybe reconsidering SVK later, once everyone is comfortable > >> (since at that point it would be very easy to switch). > >> > >> > >>> > >>>> what do we need. a webpage to register repos? > >>> > >>> no. we could use either sourceforge's SVN or host our own at > >>> puredata.info. > >>> > >>> the good thing about the 1st is, that we don't have to care about > >>> hardware, backups and the like (even if "we" only means "me") > >>> the bad thing is that sourceforge is really overloaded. > >>> the good thing about the 2nd is, that the repository is under our > >>> full > >>> control. we can also use the puredata.info accounts to access the > >>> repository (this is already set up) > >>> the bad thing is, that we have to take full control over the > >>> repository. > >>> > >> On the issue of accounts, I think it would be useful to have the two > >> layer authentication at minimum so that those uninterested in working > >> with the core source could make checkins with the "basic user" > >> account > >> without the worry of somehow causing trouble for the "core developer" > >> account. This might be a nice compromise between dozens of accounts > >> and just one. > >> > >> Finally, if any are interested, I'd be willing to mirror the CVS > >> repository on my server and convert it to Subversion just for > >> research > >> and general interest purposes. Then everyone could have a sandbox to > >> checkout SVN before the move is made. > >> > >>> of course we could also use other hosts (but then each dev has to > >>> sign > >>> up at yet another website). > >>> > >>> > >>> mfga.sdr > >>> IOhannes > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> PD-dev mailing list > >>> PD-dev@iem.at > >>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev > >>> > >> > >> Regards, > >> Luke > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > PD-dev mailing list > > PD-dev@iem.at > > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Computer science is no more related to the computer than astronomy is > related to the telescope. -Edsger Dykstra > > > > _______________________________________________ > PD-dev mailing list > PD-dev@iem.at > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev >
_______________________________________________ PD-dev mailing list PD-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
