On Dec 21, 2007, at 8:02 PM, Stephen Sinclair wrote: >> I think we can safely eliminate the "osc" from the names since there >> won't be a lot of overlap. Also, since everything is a float, I >> think it makes sense to standardize on 0-to-1 range. That's the >> standard range for amplitude, OpenGL colors, and the mapping library, >> and I think it makes sense to use it here. > > That has got to be the first time I've seen someone suggest to make an > oscillator for audio that is not in the range [-1, 1]. > Anyways, why not just allow the range to be specified.
I am talking about the control parameters, like pulse width. A negative pulse width for PWM would be meaningless, or at best bizarre :). .hc ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- "It is convenient to imagine a power beyond us because that means we don't have to examine our own lives.", from "The Idols of Environmentalism", by Curtis White _______________________________________________ PD-dev mailing list PD-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev