On Thu, 7 Feb 2008, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Since DD is a fork, I think it should not be a branch of Pd in the
repository. It can be in the same repository, I don't care either way
about that.
Why are you becoming suddenly unconcerned with the commit-history and
pd-cvs mailing-list? This is not what you have told me last week.
There's not much of a difference between a branch and a non-branch in SVN,
so I don't mind so much about that, as long as SVN really handles the
renaming perfectly.
I expected they would have wanted their own repository so that they can
control it themselves without having to deal with the Pd overhead (adding
devs, commit policy, etc). But I guess not.
adding devs could be a reason in the future, if we have more people who
_regularly_ need to commit, but aren't accepted as devs in the pure-data
sf-project. For once-a-month would-be-committers, I don't mind doing it
for them, frankly.
I don't know what you mean about the "commit policy". What is that?
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...
| Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801, Montréal QC Canada
_______________________________________________
PD-dev mailing list
PD-dev@iem.at
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
