IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
Steffen Juul wrote:That aside. Just making sure: This devel branch is branching of vanilla 0.41-4 and the only focus is the gui (as opposed to also merging devel-0.39 features)?
since 0.42 is just out, shouldn't all work be based on that? afaict, most changes in pd.tk from 0.41 to 0.42 seem to be pretty trivial.once i am able to get pd-devel running (i haven't re-tried yet), i would volunteer to incorporate these changes
@ miller: afaics the data driven dialogs (ddd) are only in a concept stage, they are not used anywhere yet. is this correct?
if so, i would just ignore them for now :-) @ pd-devel-team:iirc, the idea of pd-devel so far was to not tuch any c-code but only the tcl/tk side of things. how true is this? (i noticed quite a lot of affected C-files; i really hope this will not make the attempts of pd-devel void (i thought the deal was making pd-gui.tk usable should not force miller to accept changes on the C-side)
fgamsdr IOhannes
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
