On Jan 13, 2009, at 3:39 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: >> Steffen Juul wrote: >>> That aside. Just making sure: This devel branch is branching of >>> vanilla >>> 0.41-4 and the only focus is the gui (as opposed to also merging >>> devel-0.39 features)? > since 0.42 is just out, shouldn't all work be based on that? > > > afaict, most changes in pd.tk from 0.41 to 0.42 seem to be pretty > trivial. > once i am able to get pd-devel running (i haven't re-tried yet), i > would volunteer to incorporate these changes
Honestly, I would like to wait until the dust settles on 0.42. If there aren't major changes to u_main.tk in 0.42 and right now we aren't changing the C side, then I don't think there is any rush. .hc > @ miller: afaics the data driven dialogs (ddd) are only in a concept > stage, they are not used anywhere yet. is this correct? > if so, i would just ignore them for now :-) > > > @ pd-devel-team: > iirc, the idea of pd-devel so far was to not tuch any c-code but > only the tcl/tk side of things. how true is this? (i noticed quite a > lot of affected C-files; i really hope this will not make the > attempts of pd-devel void (i thought the deal was making pd-gui.tk > usable should not force miller to accept changes on the C-side) > > fgamsdr > IOhannes > _______________________________________________ > Pd-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- kill your television _______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
