At least we know it was an intentional difference: http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2008-04/061603.html
For extended would it be possible to exclude cyclone pow~ from the library, or less drastically patch both cyclone and vanilla pow~ to throw a warning, as was discussed last april? Matt On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 4:24 AM, Frank Barknecht <[email protected]> wrote: > Hallo, > Hans-Christoph Steiner hat gesagt: // Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > >> Gem cyclone zexy creb cxc iemlib list-abs mapping markex maxlib >> memento mjlib motex oscx pddp pdogg pixeltango pmpd rradical sigpack >> smlib toxy unauthorized vbap pan freeverb hcs jmmmp ext13 ggee >> iem_anything flib ekext flatspace pdp pidip >> >> I think it should be something like: >> >> cyclone zexy creb iemlib ggee iem_anything flatspace > > Uhm: list-abs? > > A little problem is coming up with cyclone: Its [pow~] is different > from the new builtin [pow~] in 0.42 (reversed inlets). What should we > do about that? > > Ciao > -- > Frank Barknecht Do You RjDj.me? _ ______footils.org__ > > _______________________________________________ > Pd-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev > _______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
