Hallo, Matt Barber hat gesagt: // Matt Barber wrote: > At least we know it was an intentional difference: > > http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2008-04/061603.html > > For extended would it be possible to exclude cyclone pow~ from the > library, or less drastically patch both cyclone and vanilla pow~ to > throw a warning, as was discussed last april?
This is not related to Pd-extended which AFAIK doesn't include cyclone as a library (a "-lib" loadable one), but when loaded as a lib, Cyclone does some magic to even overwrite Pd internals. I made a little check now and actually Cyclone then is very smart and aliasses the builtins to different names. Running "pd-0.42 -lib cyclone" gives this: ... warning: class 'pow~' overwritten; old one renamed 'pow~_aliased' ... and now the [pow~] behaves like in Max, while [pow~_aliased] is the new pow~ from 0.42. That's pretty cool, actually. Unfortunatly you cannot use the other cyclone objects without rewriting [pow~] when cyclone is loaded as a library. Ciao -- Frank _______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
