On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 10:58:12PM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > On Aug 16, 2009, at 10:46 PM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote: > >> On Sun, 16 Aug 2009, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: >> >>> So there has been a revived discussion of adding "tooltip" support >>> to inlets/outlets, based on Günter's old patch. I think we should >>> open up the discussion again to see if we can come up with a >>> solution that Miller would accept. I believe his original objection >>> was based on the fact that the patch added a record to the t_class >>> struct. So I was thinking that instead of storing the tooltip data in >>> t_class, it could be stored using a custom struct like >>> t_inletdescription that was then added to object's class. >> >> so the new objection will be based on the fact that the patch added a >> record to the t_class struct?... i mean, this struct doesn't make any >> difference with the original objection. > > Do you have a record of the original objection? I am just operating on > memory.
<http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1056914&group_id=55736&atid=478072> ------------------- http://mccormick.cx _______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
